Scattered overlapping papers with questions marks.

AES Assessment FAQs

Why should administrative and education support (AES) departments conducts assessment?

We assess progress on AES goals because decisions should be based on evidence rather than assumptions, and because we want to improve our strategic planning efforts, decision support, resource allocation, and operational excellence.

Every department has a unique role at the college – a distinct and important mission. That mission is only met by setting goals and by making progress towards those goals. Because meeting these goals are crucial to the effectiveness of the college and the success of its students, Queens College engages all of its AES departments in assessment.

Assessment activities showcase the contributions of AES departments, and can help AES staff identify challenges, address concerns, and be more deliberate about solutions. 

Download the AES Self-Assessment Rubric Here.

Does assessment include staff evaluation?

No – absolutely not. The purpose of administrative and educational support (AES) assessment is to improve operational effectiveness and the student experience at QC. No individual staff member has the sole responsibility for ensuring that their department’s goals are met. Therefore, any assessment of progress on AES goals must not be used to evaluate any individual staff member.

Why is it important for an AES department to formulate a mission statement?

A mission statement is a public-facing document that identifies а department’ constituents and what the department intends to provide to them. As such, mission statements are foundational to the process of assessment, providing clarity and direction by establishing the context in which the department operates and an overview of its goals.

Download our Mission Statement Worksheet here.

There is a hierarchy: CUNY has a mission statement; Queens College has a mission statement (and a somewhat longer “mission summary!”); the four divisions of the the College have missions; departments have missions; and academic programs have missions. Each mission statement provides the context for the ones below it, and each mission statement must not be inconsistent with the ones above it.

Mission statements, which are broad and general, are closely tied to a department’s statements of goals, which provide a bridge between the mission of a department and the strategies to be used to assess and guide the ways in which the department achieves its mission.

What is the difference between missions and goals?

A mission statement is a general statement that succinctly outlines the overall purpose of an department at the college. Mission statements describe what the unit does and for whom, and should be aligned with the college’s mission. Mission statements change only in the event of fundamental changes to the role or purpose of the administrative unit.

Goals are broad statements about the desired ends to which a department aspires—a vision for how the unit will fulfill its mission. Hence, goals are more specific than mission statements, but still general enough that they apply for many years. Essentially, goals provide direction when setting measurable objectives.

How are goals different from objectives?

An objective is a specific, measurable step that can be taken to meet a goal. Objectives describe how a goal will be accomplished – the intended outcomes of activities or processes that have been implemented to make progress towards a goal. Where goals are broad and general, objectives are concrete and measurable, bridging the gap between goals and assessment methods.

Download our Goals and Objectives Worksheet here.

In the administrative assessment process, measurable objectives align to operational goals and student goals.

wdt_ID Goals Objectives
1 broad/abstract narrow/concrete
2 general intentions specific actions
3 difficult to measure measurable
What is the difference between direct and indirect measures?

‘Direct measurement’ refers to measuring exactly the thing that you’re looking to measure, while ‘indirect measurement’ means that you’re measuring something by measuring something else.

Direct measures are those that measure student learning by assessing actual samples of student work. Examples include: exams/tests, papers, projects, presentations, portfolios, performances, etc. Because direct measures capture what students know and can do, and even how well, these are best for measuring achievement of student learning on specific objectives.

Indirect measures imply student learning by employing self-reported data and reports. Indirect measures help to substantiate instances of student learning. Indirect measures include surveys, interviews, course evaluations, and reports on retention, graduation, and placement, etc. These measures are commonly used in conjunction with direct measures of student learning, as best practices recommend the use of both direct and indirect measures when determining the degree of student learning that has taken place.

How is assessment different from research?

Assessment and research are similar in many ways: Both involve asking questions, collecting data, and analyzing results. Like research, assessment activities may use quantitative or qualitative research methods, and benefits from a mixed methods approach.

However, the goal of research is to confirm or challenge hypotheses to guide theory, whereas the goal of assessment is to produce reasonably accurate information about how well we are meeting our goals and guide local practice.  Many factors limit the scope and impact of assessment: time, resources, implementation, etc.. As such, assessment findings typically have implications for a single course, program or institution, whereas research findings have broader implications.

Faculty, staff, and administrators make decisions regularly, and decisions are best informed by evidence. Good assessment practices can and should guide local practice for the continual improvement of the student experience.

 

 

Assuming assessment findings will not be published, activities that are conducted for internal decision-making do not require IRB review. IRB approval is required for generalizable research involving human subjects. See CUNY’s policies on Human Research.

What are some tips for designing an administrative assessment plan?
  • Involve all members of your staff in the process of establishing a mission statement, and a set of goals and objectives. Staff participation and ownership are key to effective assessment.
  • Be sure that your objectives are not tasks. Why is it important to you to complete a certain task? That is likely your objective.
  • Be sure that your objectives are measurable. How will you know that the objective has been achieved?
  • After the mission, goals and objectives have been established, describe an assessment activity in terms of concrete steps.
  • Identify at least one direct measure for each objective.
  • If you cannot specifically describe how the findings from your assessment activities can be used to improve your program, services or operations, reconsider your proposed means of assessment.
  • Think about how assessment findings will be used to ‘close the loop’. Showing how the results of assessment are used for improvement is the most critical component of an assessment report.

Learn more here: QC Guidelines for Administrative Assessment.

What is the connection between assessment and accreditation?

The short answer is that institutions and state policymakers both make use of assessment findings. However, assessment and accreditation are very different processes with very different goals.

Accreditation is a process by which an educational institution is certified by an independent body to award certificates and degrees. The process was established nearly a century ago to foster a common set of educational standards among secondary schools and universities.

But while accreditation self studies aim to demonstrate that fiscal and human resources are being invested responsibly, faculty and staff conduct assessment to improve programs and practice. Assessment findings are an important part of the accreditation process as a key source of the evidence that we provide to our accreditation bodies, but the primary focus of assessment is to inform local decisions pertaining to courses, majors, programs, and support offices, whereas accreditation activities are meant to inform external reviewers.

 

 

Queens College is accredited by the Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE). See our 2017 MSCHE Self-Study here, or learn about our 2026 MSCHE Self-Study process here.

“Vision without execution is just hallucination” ― Thomas Edison